Nuclear energy risk management is only a small part of the Energy Risk Professional (ERP) curriculum, but I believe this area of expertise will gain in importance over the next decade. A conversation starter is this TED Debate about the usefulness of nuclear energy: Pros and cons are presented as an overview, and renewable energy is also briefly touched upon. Watch it critically and assess the arguments as a repetition of your study about nuclear energy.
Summary points “Pro nuclear”:
The waste generated by a nuclear plant for a lifetime of electricity for one person goes into one Coke can.
Many countries are already maxed out on wind, solar and water energy.
Nuclear energy is used as a disarmament tool for warheads in Russia and the US.
There are not enough renewable energy sources to provide enough electricity.
Summary points “Anti nuclear”:
CO2 emissions from nuclear are much larger than admitted by the industry, especially when compared to renewables.
Nuclear energy is a reason for nuclear weapons proliferation in developing economies.
Footprint of wind energy on the ground is the smallest, while nuclear is the largest (including safety perimeter).
There is plenty of renewable energy available today to replace nuclear power plants.
Helium-3 is a rare earth mineral in gaseous form with the potential to fuel clean nuclear fusion power plants. While scarce on our planet, He-3 is extremely abundant on the moon. A single load of the US Space-Shuttle is contended to power the entire United States for one year. Therefore, NASA plans to operate a permanent base on the Moon by 2024, but also China, India, the European Space Agency ESA, and at least one large Russian corporation, Energia, have plans of setting up manned lunar bases that should be in operation after 2020.
I find this video about He-3 very informative and to-the-point. Christopher Barnatt discusses the nuclear physics of fusion, space exploration and the global politics that may be involved in mining space for helium-3.
Just 66 nuclear power plants satisfy the bulk of all the electrical energy need throughout the USA. Together, they produce about 1,000 GW of electricity a year. The complete electricity-generating ability in the world is around 3,500 GW a year. The main dangers from a nuclear reactor are a meltdown of the core and the dispersion of radioactivity when coolant is missing, and the question how to store spent fuel. Nuclear contamination is very dangerous but is actually extremely rare, and when it happens, these accidents are always extremely well publicized.
19.9% of net generation is nuclear. Fission of uranium heats water to produce steam which rotates a turbine. In the nuclear core, material (a moderator, usually water or graphite) can be inserted between the radioactive matter that slows down the fission and cools the reactor. If water is used as that material, the reactor is called a light water reactor. Such a reactor has a 10-mile emergency planning zone. The two types of reactor processes in use are:
Pressurized water reactor (PWR). Heat is removed from the reactor by water flowing in a closed pressurized loop, and then transferred to a second water loop at lower pressure. This loop will boil and produce steam. No radioactivity ever leaves the reactor (unlike in the BWR). PWR is also more thermally efficient than BWR. Most reactors in use today are PWR.
Boiling water reactor (BWR). Water boils in the reactor itself, and the steam goes directly to the turbine generator. Small amounts of radioactivity are introduced into the pipes and turbine.
When nuclear fuel is used up, it can be stored or recycled, which often significantly minimizes the necessity to purchase new uranium and keeps operating cost of the plant down. The fuel that is stored is sealed in glass containers that can be dealt with in the two following ways:
Storage of sealed containers in very deep volcanic seashore ditches where they slowly assimilate again with the core of the earth.
Land storage (granite, volcanic tuff, salt, shale).
Storage of spent fuel poses the following two threats:
Contamination on the surroundings.
Abuse of the material for (illegal) weapons production.
Contrary to public opinion, nuclear fuel used in power plants can never sustain an explosive reaction like a nuclear bomb. This is so because a nuclear reactor contains only a very low concentration of fissionable substance (3.5-5% of U235). In contrast, a nuclear bomb concentrates in excess of 90% of fissionable components which can generate the runaway sequence effect that happens in a nuclear explosion.
Interestingly, nuclear power is a extremely handy and economic form of energy production. It is much cleaner than burning fossil fuel which emits carbon dioxide, along with SOx as well as NOx. A nuclear power plant will create no greenhouse gas. Furthermore, it costs very little to run a nuclear plant (the main cost is building it). In addition to green (totally free) energy, nuclear power plants provide the least expensive source of energy.